Skip to content now.

Do Temps Get the Shaft?

Feb 14, 2010 / Workforce / Trackback

Some­one who has on occa­sion looked to me for sup­port dur­ing a dif­fi­cult period of unem­ploy­ment and resorted to short-term assign­ments while seek­ing reg­u­lar employ­ment (you notice I did not use the word per­ma­nent, because no one’s job is) sent me the fol­low­ing ques­tion.  I have san­i­tized it and para­phrased because I think it’s the proper thing to do.

It’s con­cern­ing the treat­ment of tem­po­rary work­ers and that raises red flags because so many peo­ple have turned to temp­ing in these eco­nomic times with the hope an employer will rec­og­nize and appre­ci­ate their tal­ent and work ethic and hire them as a regular.

Karla,

I don’t know if you would know the answer to this one but why do Temps get such a bad rap and get treated so badly? I just fin­ished the assign­ment that I started in Nov, sadly due to the bud­get they couldn’t keep me on. I didn’t fin­ish what I was sup­posed to do but it was due to the CFO not hav­ing the time to sit with me and go through what he wanted to be done and how I was going to do it. So I did help the HR dept and then went onto the CFO’s office and A/P.

In the A/P dept I was treated badly and another temp was treated like a child. I don’t get it at all. I was being rep­ri­manded by two employ­ees when the CFO walked in through one door of this long nar­row office and walked past me and the other A/P employ­ees and went out the other door with­out say­ing a word. I feel that he should have inter­vened, should he have? Should I have told them not to speak to me like that? I was afraid of los­ing the posi­tion if I answered back or told them not to speak to me that way. What could I have done or said at that time?

My Dis­traught Reader,

I’m sorry you con­tinue to go through dif­fi­cult times which have resulted in feel­ings of low self-esteem and doubts of self-worth. It’s pal­lia­tive at best I’m sure to say, “you’re not alone” in your unem­ploy­ment and that 1 in 10 peo­ple are feel­ing your pain.

I don’t think there is any dif­fer­ence between an employer who treats tem­po­rary employ­ees badly and one who treats reg­u­lar employ­ees that way. There cer­tainly are too many of them and one goes with the other. Tem­po­rary employ­ees have the same right to fair treat­ment as reg­u­lar staff. If you are not being treated fairly as a tem­po­rary employee you should dis­cuss it with your employer. I sug­gest dis­cussing it with the agency you are work­ing through or in the event of direct hire, the human resources depart­ment at the work­place. There might be a “She’s just a temp” atti­tude going on that needs adjustment.

There could also be some­thing else going on inter­nally within you. The paper, “Con­tin­gent Work and Depres­sive Symp­toms: Con­tri­bu­tion of Health Selec­tion and Mod­er­at­ing Effects of Employ­ment Sta­tus,” was co-authored by Suzanne DeHaney and Anto­nio Ciampi, both from McGill. The research shows tem­po­rary and short-term con­tract jobs con­tribute to psy­cho­log­i­cal dis­tress and depres­sion. That’s a tough sit­u­a­tion when one is already dis­tressed and depressed over unem­ploy­ment in the first place. It would be help­ful for agen­cies and employ­ers of con­tin­gent work­ers to under­stand these find­ings so an appro­pri­ate strat­egy to assist in their suc­cess could be imple­mented. I haven’t seen any evi­dence of com­pa­nies doing this but that doesn’t mean it isn’t a good idea.

I hate to have to say this, but as inap­pro­pri­ate as your co-workers’ behav­ior was, you allowed your­self to be treated dis­re­spect­fully because you accepted and swal­lowed it like a bit­ter pill with­out a peep. It could be you were afraid if you spoke up your assign­ment would have been ter­mi­nated. That’s why it’s impor­tant to have doc­u­mented dis­cus­sions when funky things are going on. It would be an issue if your assign­ment were ended and then imme­di­ately refilled for no log­i­cal rea­son — like you were not per­form­ing to expec­ta­tions or vio­lated a com­pany pol­icy. It would pos­si­bly be cause to file a complaint.

You men­tioned that through­out your career you have been embar­rassed by oth­ers in the work­place and dis­re­spected before. There can be coin­ci­dences, of course. How­ever, I find when one indi­vid­ual has repeated inci­dences it is because of how she han­dles her­self. Again, this could be a mat­ter of self-esteem and con­fi­dence, inter­per­sonal skills, or other fac­tors. Have an hon­est chat with your­self or ask some­one you know in per­son and trust to give you feed­back on how they per­ceive your abil­ity to man­age rela­tion­ships. If you are a per­son that inter­nal­izes, fears rejec­tion, has a high need for accep­tance and praise and wants to be liked by every­one, you may be able to learn tech­niques to help pre­vent this type of sit­u­a­tion in the future.

As for the CFO’s actions, I can’t speak to a sit­u­a­tion I haven’t wit­nessed or inves­ti­gated. Unless it was an ugly loud scene maybe he wasn’t aware of it because he was in his men­tal P&L spread­sheet. I would have asked him about the sit­u­a­tion at the first avail­able oppor­tu­nity and not allowed myself to won­der for­ever about why he didn’t say anything.

I’m con­fused about why you said that “sadly” they couldn’t keep you on. Why on earth would you want to invest your­self there if they didn’t treat you well? I sup­pose that’s a rhetor­i­cal ques­tion. I know you’re sad about it because you just want a sta­ble job in a really bad way.

Hope­fully this helps shed a lit­tle light on the situation.



  • kwolff

    Great con­ver­sa­tion Karla. I think it points to an enor­mous set of ambi­gu­i­ties around what it means to be employed today. Have you seen this? http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2010/02/05/n_cm…

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @kwolff — I can’t believe that lady on CNN.com took my idea! Seri­ously though, I hadn’t seen it but I agree with it. We need to revamp the sys­tem. If I’ve said it once I’ll say it again (you might not have heard me) the sys­tem we have is feu­dal­is­tic for those who are employed. One day we’re going to buy health insur­ance poli­cies like we do car insur­ance –> we shop around for the best price from national providers. One day we’ll all be on con­tract and own our own tal­ent and careers for real. There will be no such thing as temp or perm and peo­ple will bid on con­tracts. What about the unskilled labor worker? Her too. In that type of econ­omy we’ll need more accoun­tants, hint, hint junior high school stu­dents… that’s your future! Thanks so much for stop­ping by and con­tribut­ing, I love video!

  • http://www.whatwoulddadsay.com/ GL Hoff­man

    Karla…thoughtful arti­cle. I think work­forces of the future will con­sist of many temp-type work­ers. Man­agers need to fig­ure out to lead, man­age and moti­vate this new work­force. After all, they will leave more quickly if any one of the above is poor.
    Inter­est­ing times we are in now, and even more so in the future. The HR per­son who can fig­ure out a way to man­age and moti­vate a temp force will be king, er, queen.

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @GL Let’s come up with the mas­ter plan… I have some ideas about what the future work­force will look like and it would be pretty cool to wear a crown. Thanks for your visit and thoughts, as always =)

  • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

    I received my copy of the SHRM HR Mag­a­zine today and lo and behold the cover story is, “Head to Head: Strike a bal­ance between temps vs. staff” on page 28. I’m not a fan of the ver­biage used on page 32, “Two Employ­ers, One Headache”… is that really the mes­sage we want to send? I don’t think so and I’m not happy the Edi­tor allowed that choice of words. The Eco­nomic Bell­wether on page 32 states, “.…U.S. Bureau of Labor Sta­tis­tics ana­lysts expect the tem­po­rary work­force to grow faster than the total work­force, although temps will still only be a small por­tion of the total.

    What do you think?

    • Brenda

      Karla,

      As a wife and mother, I have found temp­ing to be the best solu­tion in rais­ing a fam­ily. It gives free­dom to be flex­i­ble when chil­dren need you :-) On the other hand, after temp­ing for so many years, I have found it hard to tran­si­tion into a per­ma­nent posi­tion, acci­den­tally brand­ing myself as a temp. I’ve prob­a­bly learned more than the aver­age per­son in a broad range of skills, one wouldn’t nor­mally achieve on a straight career path, which is ulti­mately what led me to become a recruiter. In get­ting to the point of your orig­i­nal ques­tion, in every indus­try, every cor­po­ra­tion, every agency, every work­place sce­nario — there is always the good, the bad, and the ugly! You might have a great agency that sends you on an assign­ment where the cor­po­ra­tion is a pathetic night­mare, and vice versa. This is part of the risk and beauty of temping.…Although, I don’t receive SHRM Mag, the arti­cle you quoted about the temp work­force grow­ing faster than the reg­u­lar work­force is alarm­ing. It really hurts peo­ple who want to put down roots, buy homes, and estab­lish fam­i­lies if the only job they can get is “tem­po­rary?” How does any­one plan for their future if they have to rely on temp­ing? (It worked for me for a lot of years because I had a per­ma­nently employed spouse with excel­lent insur­ance and ben­e­fits. Notice I said “had”!) Not sure I pro­vided any kind of solu­tion or answer here — just the wis­dom of my expe­ri­ences. Thank you for writ­ing about this, it’s a sub­ject that needs to be addressed!

      • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

        @Brenda — Temp­ing was kind of rev­o­lu­tion­ary in the way it pro­vided a quasi model for flex jobs. In a way it’s kind of like Twit­ter… when there’s a #FAIL you “mosey along now there’s noth­ing to see here”. I think I’ll try to address your ques­tion “How does any­one plan for their future if they have to rely on temp­ing?” in my next post. I have hinted at what I believe is the solu­tion before and been called a rad­i­cal who doesn’t know what she’s talk­ing about. That’s OK — it will make for pas­sion­ate dia­log. Thanks for stop­ping by, read­ing and com­ment­ing. You’re always wel­come SA Brenda.

  • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

    I believe there is ample room for agen­cies to pro­vide bet­ter client ser­vice to tem­po­rary employ­ees –> I see them as clients just as much as the com­pa­nies pay­ing the fees. That doesn’t alle­vi­ate the need for tem­po­rary employ­ees to “own” their careers and man­age them accord­ingly. Lots of learn­ing and take­aways here for job seek­ers, employ­ees, agen­cies and employers.

    Shen­nee and Norm — Thanks for your comments!

  • nor­m­gavlick

    It is impor­tant to remem­ber that as a “temp” you are eval­u­at­ing the prospec­tive employer just as they are eval­u­at­ing you. Granted not all assign­ments are “temp to hire” sit­u­a­tions how­ever today a high per­cent­age are. Even when it is not des­ig­nated as such, many com­pa­nies do in fact have open­ings for which they do con­sider any temps that are assigned there. Many times a com­pany will cre­ate a posi­tion to keep a “temp” that is per­form­ing extremely well.

    Unfor­tu­nately, there is the mind­set with some employ­ers that “temps” are sec­ond class work­ers. They are treated badly, and not included in nor­mal office func­tions and events. If you are work­ing temp assign­ments, and are placed in this kind of envi­ron­ment you are not oblig­ated to stay in that posi­tion. You should notify the agency through which you are work­ing and ask them to be re-assigned. Don’t assume the agency is aware of what is going on at any par­tic­u­lar com­pany. The agency wouldn’t know unless one of their employ­ees tells them.

    Work­ing temp assign­ments is a great way to eval­u­ate prospec­tive employ­ers. It is a way to “get your foot in the door”. There are some employ­ers that only hire through “temp agen­cies”. If you want a job there you must first work as a temp. Always remem­ber that your employer while work­ing as a temp is the agency, not the com­pany to which you are assigned. If you are hav­ing prob­lems on an assign­ment, why would you want to work there? Notify your agency, and move on to the next assignment.

    One last note to keep in mind. Not all agen­cies are the same. Some agen­cies don’t treat their own employ­ees very well. They never remem­ber your name, the agency staff is always chang­ing, and there are absen­tee man­agers and/or own­ers. Go to sev­eral agen­cies to apply and sub­mit a resume. Not all agen­cies have the same clients either. When you apply with an agency they are eval­u­at­ing you from the moment you walk in the door. You will be rep­re­sent­ing them when and if they send you on an assignment.

    Tem­po­rary and con­tract staffing sales for the 3rd quar­ter of 2009 in the US was 13.3 Bil­lion dol­lars. That was in a “down” year. Maybe the temp indus­try should get a lit­tle more respect.

  • Pingback: Most Tweeted Articles by Recruitment Experts: MrTweet

  • shen­nee

    Karla– I have been on both sides of this issue. It is so unfor­t­anate that this “mis­treat­ment’ still exists within the tem­po­rary indus­try. Rep­u­ta­tions will be dam­aged, and the agen­cies will lose the most qual­i­fied can­di­dates. Really, speak­ing up as scary as it may seem, is really the best thing an employee can do. Alot of clients do not com­mu­ni­cate with the agen­cies. Fol­low up is so crit­i­cal. Nice post!
    Shen­nee


ADVERTISEMENT