<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Social Media Intervention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karlaporter.com/social-media/a-social-media-intervention/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karlaporter.com/social-media/a-social-media-intervention</link>
	<description>Human Capital &#38; New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:21:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyaeus</title>
		<link>http://karlaporter.com/social-media/a-social-media-intervention#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyaeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlaporter.com/?p=198#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Totally agree to the career suicide bit - from persoanl experience of a now x colleague who forgot that golden rule. I read once we have 50,000 thoughts a day (yeah right, who counted them?). But anyway, the trick is not to find the right way to get them out, it&#039;s to make sure they&#039;ve edited. Some people think the point is that it&#039;s the real them coming out, that expression for expressions&#039;s sake is what&#039;s it&#039;s about. It might be, and sometimes that&#039;s a joy to behold, but sometimes its like reading back that poem you wrote in 86 and thinking, was that me, did i really think - no, worse, write that? Thank God I didn&#039;t send it! Only now you can&#039;t so easily take it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree to the career suicide bit &#8211; from persoanl experience of a now x colleague who forgot that golden rule. I read once we have 50,000 thoughts a day (yeah right, who counted them?). But anyway, the trick is not to find the right way to get them out, it&#39;s to make sure they&#39;ve edited. Some people think the point is that it&#39;s the real them coming out, that expression for expressions&#39;s sake is what&#39;s it&#39;s about. It might be, and sometimes that&#39;s a joy to behold, but sometimes its like reading back that poem you wrote in 86 and thinking, was that me, did i really think &#8211; no, worse, write that? Thank God I didn&#39;t send it! Only now you can&#39;t so easily take it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Shaw</title>
		<link>http://karlaporter.com/social-media/a-social-media-intervention#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlaporter.com/?p=198#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Totally agree to the career suicide bit - from persoanl experience of a now x colleague who forgot that golden rule. I read once we have 50,000 thoughts a day (yeah right, who counted them?). But anyway, the trick is not to find the right way to get them out, it&#039;s to make sure they&#039;ve edited. Some people think the point is that it&#039;s the real them coming out, that expression for expressions&#039;s sake is what&#039;s it&#039;s about. It might be, and sometimes that&#039;s a joy to behold, but sometimes its like reading back that poem you wrote in 86 and thinking, was that me, did i really think - no, worse, write that? Thank God I didn&#039;t send it! Only now you can&#039;t so easily take it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree to the career suicide bit &#8211; from persoanl experience of a now x colleague who forgot that golden rule. I read once we have 50,000 thoughts a day (yeah right, who counted them?). But anyway, the trick is not to find the right way to get them out, it&#39;s to make sure they&#39;ve edited. Some people think the point is that it&#39;s the real them coming out, that expression for expressions&#39;s sake is what&#39;s it&#39;s about. It might be, and sometimes that&#39;s a joy to behold, but sometimes its like reading back that poem you wrote in 86 and thinking, was that me, did i really think &#8211; no, worse, write that? Thank God I didn&#39;t send it! Only now you can&#39;t so easily take it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla Porter</title>
		<link>http://karlaporter.com/social-media/a-social-media-intervention#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlaporter.com/?p=198#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Agreed. A rose is a rose by any other name. So is a water cooler. Additionally, I would like to think I am not the only one using SM to reach out to my posse when I need a little assistance. Between LinkedIn, facebook and Twitter, I believe I have an incredible wealth of knowledge and resources at the click of my mouse. So, besides the benefits of a quick break now and then, the ability to cull reputable information instantaneously is a huge benefit. The key here is to not be abusive of an employer&#039;s time if you are surfing for personal entertainment and not to post things that could (and probably will if discovered) career suicide notes in the eternal cyberspace. ~Thanks for stopping by and commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. A rose is a rose by any other name. So is a water cooler. Additionally, I would like to think I am not the only one using SM to reach out to my posse when I need a little assistance. Between LinkedIn, facebook and Twitter, I believe I have an incredible wealth of knowledge and resources at the click of my mouse. So, besides the benefits of a quick break now and then, the ability to cull reputable information instantaneously is a huge benefit. The key here is to not be abusive of an employer&#39;s time if you are surfing for personal entertainment and not to post things that could (and probably will if discovered) career suicide notes in the eternal cyberspace. ~Thanks for stopping by and commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Shaw</title>
		<link>http://karlaporter.com/social-media/a-social-media-intervention#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlaporter.com/?p=198#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Hey, came across this on a Google alert for &#039;human capital&#039; and writing from MK UK watching athletics and climbing out of a stinking head. This is exactly what I argued with a colleague working in the human capital space (she works for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hpa-group.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.hpa-group.com&lt;/a&gt; who I consult for, though my game is about turning education on its head). She blogged about how much time was being lost to business. I argued that people used to spend just as much time gossiping around the coffee stand; that taking these things away just hardly makes them more likely to be productive; and, well, if you have to, why not ask those that are good at it to now and then use the company accounts and spread some ideas. It worked: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hpa-group.com/blog/14-human-capital/27-cyberslacking.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.hpa-group.com/blog/14-human-capital/...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, came across this on a Google alert for &#39;human capital&#39; and writing from MK UK watching athletics and climbing out of a stinking head. This is exactly what I argued with a colleague working in the human capital space (she works for <a href="http://www.hpa-group.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hpa-group.com</a> who I consult for, though my game is about turning education on its head). She blogged about how much time was being lost to business. I argued that people used to spend just as much time gossiping around the coffee stand; that taking these things away just hardly makes them more likely to be productive; and, well, if you have to, why not ask those that are good at it to now and then use the company accounts and spread some ideas. It worked: <a href="http://www.hpa-group.com/blog/14-human-capital/27-cyberslacking.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hpa-group.com/blog/14-human-capital/&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- 

karlaporter.com @ 2012-05-21 20:23:57 -->
