Skip to content now.

Hello, My Name is Karla and I’m an INTP

Feb 26, 2010 / Just Me / Trackback

Chris from HR Buoy posted some­thing I thought was really cool, Hello. My Name Is Chris And I Am An ENTJ…. Mike from The Human Race Horses posted his a few years ago too.

Their trans­parency and dis­clo­sure is surely a sign of their com­fort with who they are. But then, they are both “E” types, mean­ing they like to spend time in the outer world of peo­ple and things (Extra­ver­sion), ver­sus the inner world of ideas and images (Introversion).

Uhhh.… like me.

Last week there was a Twit­ter con­ver­sa­tion float­ing around with @animal, @CincyRecruiter about intro­verts. Jen­nifer sug­gested we wran­gle a Recruit­ing Ani­mal Show away from Michael to debunk some com­mon intro­vert myths. We haven’t heard from him yet (Hel­looooo) so in the mean­time I’m going to pick up the con­ver­sa­tion here.

This isn’t the first time I am pub­licly reveal­ing my per­son­al­ity type but this is first time I am pro­vid­ing the win­dow to who I am, how I think, why I respond the way I do, why I have chal­lenges with time –> why I very often feel oth­ers “don’t get me” but I read them as eas­ily as a Snap­ple fact.

Keirsey defines the INTP per­son­al­ity type as Ratio­nal Archi­tect and the rarest of the 16 MBTI clas­si­fi­ca­tions. Sta­tis­tics say that per­haps 1% of the pop­u­la­tion is INTP and the very vast major­ity are male. Inter­est­ingly, I per­son­ally know only one other INTP woman. She was the first hire I ever recruited through Twitter.

I have always said I would retire early and I have a plan to do that by age 55. I found that INTP is one of the 3 “retire early” types and that is very com­fort­ing and reaf­firm­ing to me that there is sup­port­ing evi­dence I will achieve that. Word to the wise, “I” types take the top 3 retire early spots… I guess extro­verts have a hard time giv­ing it up.

When I say retire I don’t mean veg­e­tate I mean live a dif­fer­ent lifestyle. Per­haps it will be that Spe­cial Agent com­mune I keep talk­ing about.

Dr. David Keirsey him­self, along with C.G. Jung (I love rebels), william Har­vey and our pre­de­ces­sors, Socrates, Rene Descartes, Blaise Pas­cal, Sir Isaac New­ton, Albert Ein­stein, James Madi­son, Tomas Jef­fer­son and Charles Dar­win were all INTP’s or Ratio­nal Archi­tects. So, while I don’t presently have a lot of com­pany here on Earth, I belong to a tribe of amaz­ing change agents. I’m a par­tic­u­lar fan of Ein­stein and Darwin.

A con­cise sim­pli­fied descrip­tion from the Mey­ers & Briggs Foun­da­tion of the INTP per­son­al­ity is:

Seek to develop log­i­cal expla­na­tions for every­thing that inter­ests them. The­o­ret­i­cal and abstract, inter­ested more in ideas than in social inter­ac­tion. Quiet, con­tained, flex­i­ble, and adapt­able. Have unusual abil­ity to focus in depth to solve prob­lems in their area of inter­est. Skep­ti­cal, some­times crit­i­cal, always analytical.

I have spent sig­nif­i­cant time read­ing all the var­i­ous inter­pre­ta­tions and appre­ci­ate Keirsey’s analy­sis the most. Taken from the Keirsey analy­sis I find the fol­low­ing to be most rel­e­vant to me:

  • For Archi­tects, the world exists pri­mar­ily to be ana­lyzed, under­stood, explained — and re-designed.
  • They tend to see dis­tinc­tions and incon­sis­ten­cies instan­ta­neously, and can detect con­tra­dic­tions no mat­ter when or where they were made. It is dif­fi­cult for an Archi­tect to lis­ten to non­sense, even in a casual con­ver­sa­tion, with­out point­ing out the speaker’s error. And in any seri­ous dis­cus­sion or debate Archi­tects are dev­as­tat­ing, their skill in fram­ing argu­ments giv­ing them an enor­mous advan­tage. Archi­tects regard all dis­cus­sions as a search for under­stand­ing, and believe their func­tion is to elim­i­nate incon­sis­ten­cies, which can make com­mu­ni­ca­tion with them an uncom­fort­able expe­ri­ence for many.
  • Author­ity derived from office, cre­den­tial, or celebrity does not impress them. Archi­tects are inter­ested only in what make sense, and thus only state­ments that are con­sis­tent and coher­ent carry any weight with them.
  • Archi­tects prize intel­li­gence, and with their grand desire to grasp the struc­ture of the uni­verse, they can seem arro­gant and may show impa­tience with oth­ers who have less abil­ity, or who are less driven.

One com­mon kind of quirky INTP detail I fre­quently deal with inter­nally is not lik­ing to get involved with minu­tia or even real­iz­ing my own ideas. I often have a great idea and men­tally bring it to fruition. Because it was fin­ished in my mind suc­cess­fully I feel like I reached the objec­tive and I’m super sat­is­fied. I can be just as sat­is­fied with men­tal accom­plish­ments as phys­i­cal ones and view them as equally impor­tant. Usu­ally I’m per­fectly fine with it. I guess it’s a good thing I am moti­vated by other things besides money (hey, it doesn’t hurt but it isn’t my pri­mary moti­va­tor) because so far I haven’t sold any of my ideas..

It also means I spend a lot of time alone, very still and quiet and just work­ing in my head. I can’t remem­ber ever being bored. The down side here is I’m often unaware of time pass­ing by and my house doesn’t get clean, laun­dry doesn’t get washed and gro­cery shop­ping doesn’t get done, often enough. Though I feel like I accom­plish a lot it’s not appar­ent to oth­ers. I think it can make me appear “lazy” but I don’t feel that I am. Quite to the con­trary, I feel like I work 24/7 includ­ing in my dreams sometimes.

It’s a good thing I like what I do… Actu­ally on the phys­i­cal plane I do get quite a bit accom­plished. If you check out my about page you’ll see some of the things I’m up to that aren’t just in my head.

Do you know what your MBTI per­son­al­ity type is? Are you an extro­vert or an introvert?

You still with me here?



  • Skip­per

    I am an INTP myself, and the only one I know. It’s good to know that there are more of us out there.

    • http://karlaporter.com Karla

      Skip­per — Vir­tual cama­raderie is a good thing :)

  • Pingback: HR: Red, Blue or Purple? |

  • http://www.wholefamilynepa.blogspot.com/ Kathy Puso

    LOVE this! I was plan­ning to blog about per­son­al­ity types soon too. And here a local blog­ger is doing it… spectacular.

    I, too, am one of the less com­mon ones… the Ide­al­ist… per­haps that cre­ates a greater need to ‘edu­cate.’ I believe under­stand­ing the var­i­ous types is one of the many parts of get­ting this world to resolve con­flict, peace­fully. (Really, can u tell I am an Idealist???)

    Always love the I/rational-idealist match up because we are both abstract and ana­lyt­i­cal, but wow do we often have dif­fer­ent meth­ods to our mad­ness. (My hus­band is a Ratio­nal Mastermind…so I’ve got lots of experience). :)

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      Kathy — I am so excited to meet another local blog­ger! I’ll bet the ratio­nal ide­al­ist match up does have an inter­est­ing syn­ergy to it. I’ll bet we would have a fun con­ver­sa­tion. We should meet up some­where. Actu­ally… we should have a #NEPA blog­ger meet up, what do you think?

    • WCU Scorned

      I know Kathy (Meeker) Puso per­son­ally. While “ide­al­ist” may be one word to describe her, I choose “antagonist”.

      • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

        WCU Scorned — Kathy wasn’t antag­o­nis­tic here. I have to ques­tion what com­pelled you to share that thought on my blog? Seems rather than being scored you like to scorn.… or maybe your behav­ior is how you end up that way. Karma, ya know?

  • http://www.sanerapdc.com/ Ali­cia Are­nas (@AliciaSanera)

    Thank you for shar­ing this Karla. I’m an ENFJ or a “flam­ing F” as I like to call myself. I am mar­ried to an intro­vert and I have learned so much about the chal­lenges intro­verts face, par­tic­u­larly in busi­ness set­tings. Because of that, when I con­duct MBTI ses­sions, I spend more time dis­cussing how to bring the wis­dom and the insights of the I’s into busi­ness meet­ings, deci­sion mak­ing, etc.

    Here’s a story I think you’ll appre­ci­ate since you’re tuned in to MBTI. I was con­duct­ing a ses­sion and got to the dif­fer­ences between I’s and E’s. As I men­tioned, I gave a list of exam­ples to help the E’s under­stand and include the I’s. After I was fin­ished, an off-the-chart E said, “Ali­cia, I was count­ing and you said 13 pos­i­tive things about the I’s and only 7 about the E’s. That’s not fair.” It was very hard for me not to laugh out loud at his demon­stra­tion of clas­sic E behav­ior! (Only MBTI nerds will get this.) :-)

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @AliciaSanera I love that story! I’ll bet it got quite a few I’s rolling their eye­balls. Thanks for your visit, shar­ing your per­son­al­ity type, com­ment and mini MBTI lesson =)

  • http://twitter.com/Arleen14 Arleen Sarp­praicone

    Thank you Karla for this inter­est­ing post. This is a great way to get to know each other bet­ter, I’m always inter­ested in these assess­ments and I’m not sur­prised at all by the results! Many have been shocked to learn that I’m an Intro­vert when they first meet me in per­son, it’s a chal­lenge to help peo­ple under­stand that after awhile I can be noted for “keep­ing to myself” only to re-charge!

    Hello, my name is Arleen and I’m an INTJ — The “Strategist”

    INTJs are intro­spec­tive, ana­lyt­i­cal, deter­mined per­sons with nat­ural lead­er­ship abil­ity. Being reserved, they pre­fer to stay in the back­ground while lead­ing. Strate­gic, knowl­edgable and adapt­able, INTJs are tal­ented in bring­ing ideas from con­cep­tion to real­ity. They expect per­fec­tion from them­selves as well as oth­ers and are com­fort­able with the lead­er­ship of another so long as they are com­pe­tent. INTJs can also be described as deci­sive, open-minded, self-confident, atten­tive, the­o­ret­i­cal and prag­matic.
    Intro­verts tend to be quiet, peace­ful and delib­er­ate and are not attracted to social inter­ac­tions. They pre­fer activ­i­ties they can do alone or with one other close friend, activ­i­ties such as read­ing, writ­ing, think­ing, and invent­ing. Intro­verts find social gath­er­ings drain­ing.
    Intu­itive peo­ple focus on the future and the pos­si­bil­i­ties. They process infor­ma­tion through pat­terns and impres­sions. They read between the lines, they are abstract thinkers.
    Think­ing peo­ple are objec­tive and make deci­sions based on facts. They are ruled by their head instead of their heart. Think­ing peo­ple judge sit­u­a­tions and oth­ers based on logic.
    Judg­ing does not mean “judg­men­tal”. Judg­ing peo­ple like order, orga­ni­za­tion and think sequen­tially. They like to have things planned and set­tled. Judg­ing peo­ple seek closure.

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @Arleen14 Thanks for join­ing the dia­log and shar­ing who and how you are. Hav­ing worked with you in your job search I can com­pletely see how your career objec­tive align with INTJ.

  • paris22

    Thanks for shar­ing some of your per­son­al­ity type with us. You for­got to add excel­lent co-host and friend. Some com­ments reminded me of that old Temp­ta­tions song Ball of Con­fu­sion http://is.gd/9heJp with some peo­ple claim­ing to be facil­i­ta­tors, admin­is­tra­tors and even inter­pre­ta­tors. HR Con­fu­sion that’s what it sounds like to me. As I always say some can’t get away from that “Leg­ends in their own mine” scenario.

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @Paris22 Oh Paul, the assess­ment pre-dates The Ex-Recruiter =) but thanks for the friend­ship note.. it couldn’t be more rec­i­p­ro­cal. MBTI defines 16 per­son­al­ity types (and then today I defined a 17th = @animal) and I try hard to take that into account with each indi­vid­ual I deal with and try to build a rap­port with. Cer­tainly some per­son­al­ity types are rather dra­matic and have a higher need for accep­tance and lik­a­bil­ity with­out doubt. Some peo­ple have an innate desire to influ­ence and be the cen­ter of atten­tion. This is just how they are hard­wired. The way I ratio­nal­ize it is with ice cream… if we only had vanilla it would be BORING!

  • http://www.resumeconfidential.ca/ Karen Siwak

    Karla, I think you’ve started (or per­pet­u­ated) an awe­some idea. INFP here. Healer with a messy desk. As a fel­low intro­vert, I under­stand that we intro­verts aren’t anti­so­cial or shy, we just need ‘alone time’ to rebuild our energy reserves. Great post!

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @ResumeStrategy — Karen, I will stick with per­pet­u­ated because this is one idea that totally was not mine, it belongs to Chris =) but it’s fun and edu­ca­tional, builds rap­port and helps us grow closer and under­stand one another bet­ter. Those are the tribal com­mon­al­i­ties we have here regard­less of our per­son­al­ity types. XXXOOO

  • http://twitter.com/pawspagal Margo Rose

    I been qual­i­fied to admin­is­ter, facil­i­tate and inter­pret the results of the MBTI since 1997. I’ve been cer­ti­fied to facil­i­tate and admin­is­ter other tem­pera­ment sorters, but I still think the MBTI, and the research that Kiersy added of late, is the best by far. There are per­son­al­ity pro­files, for per­son­al­ity pro­files today, it seems. Yet, I keep com­ing back to the MBTI because it is based on empir­i­cal and sta­tis­ti­cally valid data. Time and time again, it rings true. We used to use the MBTI for team build­ing, con­flict res­o­lu­tion, com­mu­ni­ca­tion, career devel­op­ment, and rela­tion­ship build­ing. I used to adapt this train­ing and assess­ment for sales teams, tech­ni­cal teams, lead­er­ship teams, and for exec­u­tive coach­ing. We make light of our “tribes” and “twibes” on twit­ter. How­ever, isn’t it inter­est­ing how cer­tain peo­ple seem to be drawn to one another? I think cer­tain per­son­al­ity types are nat­u­rally drawn to one another.

    My pro­fes­sor and men­tor in grad­u­ate school used to say that “oppo­sites attract,” but if left in the same room long enough, they’ll try to kill each other ;) He sug­gests find­ing a sim­i­lar, com­pli­men­tary per­son­al­ity type to bond with for love rela­tion­ships. In my many years of study in human behav­ior, I’m inclined to agree. While we learn from our oppo­sites, when bond­ing with loved ones, sim­i­lar beats oppo­sites. The oppo­site is true in the work­place, we need to have oppo­sites, and rep­re­sen­ta­tions for many dif­fer­ent per­son­al­i­ties to develop a high func­tion­ing work team.

    There’s been much dis­cus­sion about lists this week. #Fol­lowFri­day is an over­sim­pli­fied influ­ence list. The list that mat­ters most is the one we cre­ate in our minds. In the final analy­sis, we have to val­i­date and list our­selves. If we wait for some­one else to do so, it will be like wait­ing for Godot.

    Two career devel­op­ment and tran­si­tion books I highly rec­om­mend are “Do What You Are” and “Please Under­stand Me II” they are both extremely help­ful in get­ting to know your­self better.

    Your twit­ter pal

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @HRMargo Thanks for your com­ment. I believe it is human nature to quest to “find one’s self”. I have taken all the per­son­al­ity assess­ments I have run into over the years and they all come out the equiv­a­lent of INTP/Thinker/Architect. I’m not so fix­ated on labels as I am inter­ested in one’s inabil­ity to have intro­spec­tion and under­stand their strengths and areas of oppor­tu­nity. That’s what I feel these assess­ments do. There are indi­vid­u­als that do not have a great deal of self aware­ness (some appear to have zilch)… I have never suf­fered from that and could list my traits with­out test tak­ing. I am acutely aware of what peo­ples’ per­cep­tions of me are — even when they do not tell me. I know when they are favor­able and when they are not.

      You must have fond mem­o­ries of admin­is­ter­ing these assess­ments in your past, you speak very pas­sion­ately about them =) I’m so happy you found a new job Margo. Every closed door means a new one down the hall.. I always say, do what you love and it isn’t work at all.

  • http://kamaletalent.com/ Krista Fran­cis

    You are brave, Karla! I am an intro­vert also (INFP). It doesn’t mean we don’t love peo­ple, we just love them in smaller doses and might need to recharge in between.

    Here’s a state­ment about INFP’s that speaks to me: “Their job must be fun, although not rau­cous, and it must be mean­ing­ful to them. They need a strong pur­pose in their work.” Human resources was men­tioned on sev­eral sites as a pos­si­ble career; hmmm, I’ll have to think about that!

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @KristaFrancis Haha, brave I don’t know but I do enjoy stretch­ing myself in areas I might not be exactly com­fort­able in. I lit­er­ally feel like I took my clothes off for this though. I think HR is a great pro­fes­sion for IN peo­ple.. I per­son­ally feel a lot of extro­verts get too wrapped up in employ­ees’ lives and are not as ana­lyt­i­cal as they ought to be to help man­age the busi­ness. I’ll prob­a­bly get smacked down for say­ing that, LOL.

  • shen­nee

    Karla,
    Hi My name is Shen­nee and I am ESTJ. I just took the test to see what my eval­u­a­tion was..
    It is very inter­est­ing sci­ence behind per­son­al­ity and Com­pat­i­bil­ity. I most appre­ci­ate you shar­ing this infor­ma­tion about your­self and your per­son­al­ity type. Can you post a link to get a more in-deph eval­u­a­tion?
    Nice post as always!
    Shen­nee:-)

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @Shennee_Rutt It’s a great way for us to learn more about each other — Agreed! @ResumeStrategy posted this link http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp so any­one can peek into their personality..

  • HRBuoy

    Love the post Karla! It is great to learn more about each other, thank you for sharing.

  • http://www.cincyrecruiter.com/ Jen­nifer McClure

    Thanks for shar­ing some more infor­ma­tion about your­self and your per­son­al­ity type. Hope­fully, with a con­certed effort among us Intro­verts, we’ll debunk some of the myths and incor­rect assump­tions out there about us. It seems that you’ve reviewed a lot of infor­ma­tion to under­stand your­self — and are com­fort­able with that. I think that’s a com­mon theme among most intro­verts. We’re ok with who we are. Unfor­tu­nately, it seems many extro­verts aren’t com­fort­able with who we are.

    Did you take the MBTI online to get the graphic dis­played in the post, or is it some­thing you’ve done in the past? It’s been awhile since I’ve done the Meyer’s Briggs and would like to see more data about my per­son­al­ity type (an ISTJ trait I’m sure). :)

    • http://karlaporter.com/ Karla Porter

      @CincyRecruiter Jen­nifer, thanks for your thought­ful com­ments. MyPersonality.info has a great assort­ment of short ver­sions. Or if you take the long ver­sion and know your type you can grab a badge. Check your email — I sent you a present.

      I am com­fort­able with myself and I think you said it best, “We’re ok with who we are. Unfor­tu­nately, it seems many extro­verts aren’t com­fort­able with who we are.”


ADVERTISEMENT